Resources

Explore our extensive library of resources rooted in practice and presented here freely for the benefit of civil society.  

INTRAC in Central Asia 1994-2018: a story of the past, the present and the future

Authors:

Charles Buxton, Anne Garbutt, Janice Giffen, Chynara Irisova, Konstantin Kovtunets, Anara Moldosheva, Brian Pratt, Medet Tiulegenov, Chris Wardle and Nazgul Zakiriaeva

INTRAC’s Experience of Working with International NGOs on Aid Withdrawal and Exit Strategies from 2011 to 2016

This article offers insights into what researchers at INTRAC have learned about the interests, priorities and strategies of international NGOs in relation to aid withdrawal and exit processes.

What’s it like to be on the receiving end of exit? A partner and country office view

This learning paper brings together valuable stories from individuals that have been through exit and transitions.

Authors:

Sarah Lewis, with Ashokan Selliah, Dr Kapila Edussuriya, Gerhard Buttner, Hanitra Raharimanana and Yvonne Orengo, on behalf of the PPA Partnership Approaches Learning Group.

Special Series Paper 1. Exit strategies and sustainability. Lessons for practitioners

Recognising the demand in the sector, this document compiles blog posts on exit strategies and sustainability of civil society organisations and their work.

Responsible exit and sustainability webinar

Missed INTRAC's webinar 'Whose responsibility is it to push for well-planned exit?'? Listen to the recording on our resource centre.

Authors:

INTRAC with Kennesaw State University and Valuing Voices.

Monitoring and Evaluation Planning Series

A special series of short papers dealing with the central area of planning for monitoring and evaluation. This is in recognition that planning and M&E are closely linked, and that effective planning is often a pre-condition for effective M&E.

Applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis to understand reasons for research uptake

In the absence of definitive guidance on how to use and integrate Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) into existing Monitoring and Evaluation systems and practice, this paper is primarily intended as a practical contribution to the growing knowledge base on how QCA might (or might not) strengthen learning and accountability agendas.

Authors:

Vera Scholz, Amy Kirbyshire and Nigel Simister

M&E Paper 10. Summarising portfolio change: results frameworks at organisational level

This paper describes some of the different methods and options available to help summarise results and learning across large portfolios of work, carried out in different regions, countries and sectors.

Author: