Theory of Change facilitator’s guide for Oxfam GB
INTRAC developed a training pack on Theory of Change for Oxfam GB. This provided practical guidance and materials for facilitating […]
Supporting learning: a study on incentives and disincentives for learning in international transparency and accountability grant-making practice
In 2015 INTRAC carried out a study for the Transparency and Accountability Initiative (T/AI) on how grant-making can encourage and […]
Evaluation of Danish strategy for support to civil society
INTRAC has been working since 2013 with Danida on an evaluation of the Danish Strategy for Support to Civil Society. […]
Ten ways to help others do their best thinking
By Paula Haddock. “The quality of everything we do, everything, depends on the quality of the thinking we do first.” […]
Action learning set on exit strategies
Building on INTRAC’s work on aid withdrawal, we facilitated an Action Learning Set (ALS) on exit strategies with the British […]
Funders’ Collaborative for Children: a formative evaluation
INTRAC undertook a two-year formative evaluation of the Funders’ Collaborative for Children (FCFC) taking place between 2011 and 2013. While […]
Praxis Note 62. It takes two to tango: reversed organisational assessments between Northern and Southern civil society organisations
Do Southern civil society organisations (CSOs) have a role to play in assessing the performance of their Northern partners? What can we learn from attempts to include Southern partners in assessing our organisations?
Civil Society at a Crossroads
INTRAC was one of six civil society support organisations involved in Civil Society at a Crossroads, a collective reflection process about the future of civil society around the world.
Peer Learning Programme for small and diaspora organisations
The Peer Learning Programme (PLP) was facilitated by INTRAC between 2010 and 2013 as part of Comic Relief’s Common Ground […]
Praxis Paper 25. Capacity Building for Advocacy
This Praxis Paper looks at current practice, experiences and theory in advocacy capacity building. The paper’s findings are primarily directed at civil society support organisations globally, but the insights are relevant to CSOs, donors, research institutions and individuals from a variety of backgrounds.
Monitoring and Evaluating Learning Networks: Dealing With Dilemmas
Do learning networks really make any difference? Do people ever apply what they have learnt? And how does this […]
Monitoring and Evaluating Learning Networks
This short paper provides some pragmatic ideas about what we need to assess and how this monitoring and evaluation can be done in relatively simple and cost-effective ways.